Same Day ACH Tops $1.1 Trillion: What Record Growth Means for Lenders

7 May 2026
John O'Shea
No comments
Categories: ACH, Lenders, Merchants, Payments

Same Day ACH Tops $1.1 Trillion

What the Latest Growth Mean for Lenders

Borrowers have become accustomed to instant access. They can order products online, transfer money between accounts, and receive payments within seconds. As these expectations continue to shape consumer behavior, they are increasingly influencing the lending industry as well.

When a loan is approved, borrowers no longer compare their experience solely against other lenders. They compare it against every other digital experience in their lives. Waiting days for funds to arrive can feel outdated, particularly when the need for funds is urgent.

Recent ACH Network growth data suggests that financial institutions and businesses are responding to this demand for faster payments. During the first quarter of 2026, Same Day ACH volume increased 23.6% year-over-year to 403 million payments, while the value of those payments reached $1.1 trillion, an increase of 22.1%.

These numbers demonstrate that faster payment capabilities are becoming increasingly important across the financial ecosystem, including lending.

Same Day ACH volume reached 403 million payments during the first quarter of 2026, while payment value exceeded $1.1 trillion for the second consecutive quarter.

Why Faster Funding Matters

For many borrowers, access to funds is the most important part of the lending experience.

A streamlined application process and quick approval lose much of their value if borrowers must wait days to receive their money. Whether funding is needed for emergency expenses, home repairs, vehicle repairs, medical bills, or short-term cash flow needs, delays can negatively impact borrower satisfaction.

Faster funding can help lenders:

  • Improve borrower satisfaction
  • Increase repeat borrowing activity
  • Strengthen customer retention
  • Differentiate themselves in a competitive market
  • Reduce funding-related support inquiries

As borrower expectations continue to evolve, funding speed has become an important part of the overall customer experience.

Same Day ACH Remains a Practical Funding Solution

While much attention has been focused on real-time payment networks such as RTP and FedNow, Same Day ACH continues to experience significant growth.

One reason is accessibility.

Most financial institutions already participate in the ACH Network, making Same Day ACH a practical option for many lenders that want to accelerate funding without implementing entirely new payment workflows.

Same Day ACH can help lenders:

  • Deliver funds faster than traditional ACH
  • Improve operational efficiency
  • Reduce delays caused by batch processing
  • Provide more predictable settlement timing
  • Expand funding options for borrowers

For many lending organizations, Same Day ACH serves as an effective bridge between traditional ACH processing and real-time payment solutions.

ACH Continues to Support Digital Lending Growth

The first-quarter ACH data also showed strong growth in business-to-business payments and continued expansion across internet-based transactions.

This broader growth reflects an ongoing migration away from paper-based payment methods and toward digital payment experiences.

For lenders, this trend extends beyond loan funding. ACH remains a critical tool for:

  • Recurring loan payments
  • Account verification processes
  • Consumer disbursements
  • Collections and repayment programs
  • Settlement and reconciliation operations

As lending becomes increasingly digital, ACH continues to provide the foundation for many borrower-facing payment experiences.

What Lenders Should Do Now

The continued growth of Same Day ACH provides an opportunity for lenders to evaluate whether their payment strategy aligns with borrower expectations.

Consider the following questions:

  • How quickly can borrowers receive funds after approval?
  • Are funding delays creating friction in the borrower experience?
  • Could Same Day ACH improve customer satisfaction or retention?
  • Are there opportunities to incorporate RTP or FedNow alongside existing ACH processes?

Lenders that proactively evaluate their payment capabilities today will be better positioned to meet the expectations of tomorrow’s borrowers.

Final Thoughts

The first quarter of 2026 highlighted the continued strength of the ACH Network, but the most significant takeaway for lenders may be the ongoing growth of Same Day ACH.

As borrowers increasingly expect faster access to funds, lenders must balance speed, efficiency, risk management, and operational simplicity. Same Day ACH continues to provide a practical solution that helps bridge those competing priorities.

At Viking, solutions such as VIKExpress, VIKEdge, and VIKEngage help lenders modernize payment operations, improve funding experiences, and maintain visibility into transaction performance as payment expectations continue to evolve.

Return to Viking Resource Center

May 7, 2026

About John O’Shea

He is a former founder and owner of Triad Financial Services and has served in similar roles at GMAC/Residential Funding, AllianceOne and ICT Group (now Sykes). He has performed for 28 years as a senior executive in the ARM, Customer Contact and BPO markets. He is a graduate of St. Olaf College.

Learn More

Bigger Possibilities Await.

Contact Us


Read More

The Real-Time Lending Advantage

19 December 2025
Adam Garrett
No comments
Categories: ACH, Lenders, Merchants, Payments

The Real-Time Lending Advantage

How Instant Payments Are Reshaping Borrower Expectations and Lender Strategies

The Age of Instant Expectations

We live in an economic era defined by immediacy. Consumers can order groceries with a tap, stream any movie on demand, and transfer funds between accounts in seconds. Against this backdrop, the traditional lending model (filled with processing windows, banking hours, and settlement delays) feels increasingly outdated. For many borrowers, the expectation of speed is no longer aspirational. It is assumed.

This expectation is particularly pressing in lending, where delays in access to funds can have real-life consequences. A borrower seeking emergency funds to avoid eviction, cover a medical expense, or fix a vehicle can’t wait until the next business day. For them, funding delays aren’t just an inconvenience …they’re a liability.

The advent of Real-Time Payments (RTP), including the RTP® network and the Federal Reserve’s FedNow℠ Service, offers a transformative solution. These payment rails allow funds to be delivered to a borrower’s bank account within seconds, 24/7, including nights, weekends, and federal holidays. And yet, adoption within the lending industry (especially among traditional lenders) remains patchy.

This article explores the gap between borrower expectations and lender capabilities, the strategic advantages of real-time funding, and why institutions that act now will define the next generation of consumer finance. From borrower loyalty and operational efficiency to fraud mitigation and competitive positioning, the case for real-time disbursement has never been stronger or more urgent.

Borrower Expectations Are Changing

Today’s borrowers do not compare lenders to each other, they compare them to every other modern digital experience they engage with. When ridesharing apps, food delivery services, and peer-to-peer payments all operate in real-time, any financial service that introduces friction or delay feels archaic.

This shift is particularly acute among:

  • Gig economy workers, who expect same-day access to earnings.
  • Freelancers and consultants, who often rely on immediate cash flow between contracts.
  • Low-to-moderate income borrowers, for whom a one-day delay could mean an overdraft or a missed bill.

A recent study by the Federal Reserve found that 78% of consumers prefer faster payment methods when available, with 82% valuing real-time confirmation of funds. Furthermore, 26% of consumers identified last-minute bill payment as one of the top use cases where real-time payments would provide the most benefit.

Notably, 25% of respondents cited slow speed of funds as one of their most frustrating pain points in payments, second only to fees. As one millennial respondent put it: “Some apps charge a significant fee to move money or take 2–3 days to transfer. Eliminate fees and speed up the transfers.”

Borrowers aren’t just reacting to delays, they’re building their financial behaviors around speed.

Borrower Takeaway: If the funds aren’t available instantly, the lender isn’t either.

Real-Time Payments as a Loyalty Engine

Loan disbursement isn’t just a back-office function. It’s the moment of truth in the borrower journey. Delays at this critical stage diminish the borrower’s perception of the lender, even if the application and approval processes were seamless.

RTP changes that. With instant funding, a borrower can go from application to funds-in-hand in under a minute. That kind of performance creates what behavioral economists call a “gratification anchor” …a strong positive association that makes the borrower more likely to return, and more likely to recommend.

What this translates to in practice:

  • Higher reloan rates
  • Lower first-payment defaults (FPD)
  • Better Net Promoter Scores (NPS)
  • Reduced abandonment during application flow

According to the Fed’s 2024 Consumer Payments Study, consumers cited immediate notifications, the ability to use funds 24×7, and ease of sending as top motivators for choosing real-time payment methods.

Example:
A mid-sized lender using VIKExpress saw a 27% increase in same-month repeat borrowing after enabling real-time disbursement. Their marketing and acquisition costs didn’t change. Their retention strategy simply became faster.

Lending in a 24/7 Economy

Real-time payments are not just faster, they’re always on. That matters more than most lenders realize.

In today’s lending environment, loan applications peak during off-hours. Evening and weekend traffic accounts for over 40% of all digital applications across short-term and installment loan platforms. Traditional ACH infrastructure forces lenders to delay funding until the next business day, creating a disconnect between borrower action and lender response.

According to the Federal Reserve’s 2024 data, Gen Z and Millennials rank last-minute bill payment and digital wallet top-ups as top use cases for faster payments. Baby Boomers and Gen X prioritize loan disbursements and real estate or auto-related payouts, making RTP a cross-generational benefit.

With RTP or FedNow:

  • Applications at 10pm on Sunday can be funded at 10:01pm.
  • Loans approved on Thanksgiving can be delivered within 60 seconds.
  • Borrowers on the West Coast applying after East Coast banking hours aren’t left waiting until morning.

Use Case:
A tribal lender operating nationally found that enabling 24/7 funding helped them increase weekend originations by 46% year-over-year. The most common feedback in their borrower reviews? “I got my money right away.”

Operational Efficiency and Fraud Mitigation

Beyond the borrower experience, real-time disbursement offers critical backend advantages.

1. Elimination of card funding risks:
Unlike push-to-debit solutions, RTP does not require lenders to collect or store card data. This minimizes exposure to fraud vectors like synthetic identity, card cycling, and prepaid reload scams.

2. Superior reconciliation:
Each RTP transaction posts individually and immediately, with detailed confirmation. This eliminates batch files, delayed returns, and uncertainty about when funds will settle.

3. Fewer failed disbursements:
Since RTP relies on DDA account data validated in advance, there’s less room for error. Combined with tools like VIKEdge (which verify account balances in prior to debit origination), lenders can create a tightly managed funding and repayment cycle with fewer break points.

4. Faster issue resolution:
When disbursement questions arise, RTP provides instant confirmation, something ACH systems often cannot do for 24–48 hours.

Bottom line: RTP reduces funding exceptions, improves cash management, and simplifies audit trails.

Implementation Is Easier Than You Think

The assumption that RTP requires months of technical work or massive IT investment is outdated. Today’s platforms are built for flexibility.

With VIKExpress, for example:

  • Existing ACH clients can activate RTP with a simple addendum.
  • Clients can use the RTP-enabled virtual terminal while integrating APIs in parallel.
  • Production credentials and sandbox access are provisioned within 24–48 hours.

Some lenders go live in under a week.

Integration Approaches:

  • Direct API (ideal for scale lenders with dev resources)
  • LMS plug-ins (supported in platforms like Infinity, QFund, EPIC, and others)
  • Manual transactions via web-based portal (for low-volume or transitional use)

Whether you’re a high-frequency originator or a niche tribal lender, the barrier to entry is no longer technical.

Competitive Pressure and Industry Movement

The longer a lender waits to adopt real-time payments, the more likely they are to fall behind.

Why?
Because RTP is not just a differentiator, it’s rapidly becoming table stakes.

PYMNTS and Fed data show that:

  • 89% of surveyed companies have used RTP for at least one type of payout
  • Gen Z and Millennials are 2x as likely to use real-time payments compared to older cohorts
  • Instant disbursement usage is growing across verticals including insurance, auto lending, and online marketplaces

The Federal Reserve’s study also found that consumers using real-time payments rated their satisfaction with their financial institution 8% higher than those who did not. This suggests that beyond borrower acquisition and retention, RTP can also boost your institutional brand.

What this means for lenders:

  • Affiliate marketers increasingly prioritize lenders who fund instantly
  • Licensing renewals and state reviews now evaluate speed and transparency
  • Borrower churn rises when competitors offer a faster experience

As borrower demands and partner expectations increase, lenders without RTP will not just lose deals… they’ll lose credibility.

Lending in Real-Time Isn’t Optional. It’s Inevitable.

The case for real-time disbursement is no longer theoretical. It’s here. It’s proven. And it’s what borrowers expect.

Lenders who embrace RTP now position themselves as forward-looking, borrower-first institutions. They also position themselves for operational scale, lower risk, and higher return.

Those who wait will find themselves explaining delays that borrowers (and the market) no longer tolerate.

Next Steps for Lenders:

  • Audit your disbursement timelines. How long do borrowers really wait?
  • Identify your weekend and off-hours volume. Are you missing revenue?
  • Talk to your payments partner. Can they activate RTP now? (If not, you may need a new partner.)

Real-time lending is not just the future. It’s the new baseline. Don’t fall behind.

Return to Viking Resource Center

December 19, 2025

About Adam Garrett

He has spent almost 20 years building successful merchant acquiring programs and is a proven sales leader who brings his expertise in team management, business development, and strategic planning to Viking Payments. He received his MBA from the University of Texas at Dallas, and his BS at Missouri State University.

Learn More

Bigger Possibilities Await.

Contact Us


Read More

Nacha Fraud Monitoring Updates, Risk Management

9 December 2025
Megan Williams
No comments
Categories: ACH, Lenders, Merchants, Payments

Nacha Fraud Monitoring Updates

As 2025 comes to a close, attention is shifting to 2026 and the next wave of changes in the ACH Network. Nacha has announced several upcoming rule amendments that strengthen risk management expectations, clarify existing requirements, and introduce new monitoring obligations for ACH participants. This article outlines the key updates so businesses can understand what to expect as these Rules take effect throughout 2026.

Some of the changes are minor clarifications that will have limited impact on most participants. Others, particularly those related to fraud monitoring, represent more meaningful shifts in expectations. Not all changes will apply to every Originator, Third Party Sender, or ODFI, but all ACH participants should be aware of what is coming.

Effective January 1, 2026

Use of Return Code R17 “Questionable”
This update clarifies the proper use of R17 rather than introducing a new return code. Under the revised definition, an RDFI may return an entry as “Questionable” when it believes the transaction or Receiver information is inaccurate, incomplete, or inconsistent with what it knows about the account. This change provides clearer guidance for RDFIs and creates earlier feedback for Originators when something about the entry appears suspicious.

Banking Day Definition Clarification
This is not a substantive change but a clarification. It confirms that a “Banking Day” is defined as a day on which the ACH Operator is open for business. The goal is to remove ambiguity and ensure uniform interpretation across the network.

RDFI Requirement to Provide Payment-Related Information
Several SEC Codes require RDFIs to provide Payment-Related Information to Receivers. These include CCD, CTX, CIE and IAT. The updated Rule clarifies that this requirement does not apply if these entries post to a consumer account. The expectation only applies when the Receiver is a non-consumer.

Company Entry Descriptions
These amendments take effect March 20, 2026 and apply to both credits and debits. Originators may adopt the new descriptions before the effective date. The changes support standardization and enhanced monitoring across the network.

ACH Credit Entry
The Company Entry Description for credits that represent wages or other compensation must contain the description PAYROLL.

ACH Debit Entry
For ACH WEB debits that represent the online purchase of goods, including recurring purchases first authorized online, the Company Entry Description must contain the description PURCHASE.

Risk Management Rule Updates
The most significant changes relate to fraud monitoring. Nacha is introducing new requirements for Originators, ODFIs, Third Party Service Providers, and Third Party Senders, along with a separate monitoring requirement for RDFIs. These Rules are being phased in during 2026.

Fraud Monitoring Obligations

These new expectations apply to ODFIs, non-consumer Originators, TPSPs, and TPSs. The requirements take effect in two phases.

Phase 1: March 20, 2026
Applies to participants with annual origination volume of 6 million or more in 2023.

Phase 2: June 19, 2026
Applies to all remaining non-consumer Originators, TPSPs, and TPSs not included in Phase 1.

The purpose of the amendment is to ensure participants establish and implement risk-based processes and procedures designed to identify potentially fraudulent entries. Routine monitoring is expected to reduce the likelihood of successful fraud attempts and strengthen the entire ACH ecosystem.

Today, Originators of WEB debits and users of Micro-Entries must utilize a “commercially reasonable fraudulent transaction detection system”. The updated Rule removes that terminology. The phrase “commercially reasonable” and the expectation of a “transaction detection system” are replaced with more practical language that focuses on processes and procedures.

This shift clarifies that Nacha is not prescribing specific technologies. Instead, entities must maintain documented processes that demonstrate how they reasonably identify and respond to fraud risks, based on the role they play in the ACH Network. The flexibility allows organizations of different sizes and risk profiles to implement approaches appropriate to their environments.

Nacha requires that these processes and procedures be reviewed at least annually, or sooner if material changes occur during the year.

RDFI ACH Credit Monitoring

This update adds new expectations for RDFIs related to monitoring of incoming ACH credits. The Rule does not impose new obligations on Viking Originators but is part of Nacha’s broader fraud prevention strategy.anges, reach out to your Viking representative today.

Preparing for 2026 and Beyond

As these updates take effect in 2026, ACH participants should take time to review their current practices, confirm that documentation is up to date, and ensure fraud monitoring processes align with Nacha’s expectations. While some of the changes are minor clarifications, others require operational adjustments that strengthen risk management across the network. Viking will continue to monitor these developments and support our clients through each phase of implementation to ensure a smooth and compliant transition.

Return to Viking Resource Center

December 9, 2025

About Megan Williams

She is a dedicated payments professional with a passion for operational processes, efficiencies and a love for the Rules. She has been in the financial services industry since 2016, strengthening her understanding of the space and obtaining her ACH Certification (AAP). She specializes in optimizing operations, enhancing payment processes and ensuring compliance in all matters of her job and this industry. 

Learn More

Bigger Possibilities Await.

Contact Us


Read More

New ACH Rules: What Originators and RDFIs Must Know in 2025

17 July 2025
Megan Williams
No comments
Categories: ACH, Lenders, Merchants, Payments

New ACH Rules
What Originators and
RDFIs Must Know in 2025

With ACH fraud risks rising, Nacha has introduced key updates, some in effect now and others phasing in through 2026. Here’s what you need to know and act on today.

Credit Push Fraud Risk Management Framework

Credit push fraud, such as Business Email Compromise(BEC) or vendor impersonation, is a growing threat,  and Nacha has reinforced roles and protocols to combat it. In a typical BEC scenario, fraudsters gain access to or spoof a legitimate business email account to trick someone into sending an ACH credit or wire transfer to a fraudulent destination. These attacks often involve fake invoices, altered payment instructions, or urgent requests that appear to come from a trusted internal or external source. As these scams become more sophisticated, financial institutions and businesses must adapt their defenses accordingly.

Receiving institutions must now monitor incoming credits and have risk-based procedures to identify and act on suspicious entries.

ODFIs and RDFIs are encouraged to communicate when suspected fraud is identified. A secure exchange portal is now available for handling return requests, particularly under R06.

Institutions should also educate business and consumer clients about common fraud tactics to increase vigilance before a transaction is initiated.

False Pretenses Transactions

Nacha has introduced a new classification called False Pretenses (which is included in the R17 return code). This covers payments induced by misrepresentation of identity, authority, or account ownership. Examples include payroll impersonation and vendor fraud. It does not apply to scams involving fake products or services.

Return Reason Code R17 – “Questionable”

RDFIs can now use R17 to return entries they believe may be fraudulent, even if the receiving account is valid.

The word “QUESTIONABLE” must be included in the addenda record when this return reason is used.

Return Reason Code R06 – Broader Return Requests

ODFIs can now request returns through the Letter of Indemnity (LOI) process using R06 for other reasons that are applicable to the scenario, such as suspected fraud.

RDFIs must respond to R06 requests within 10 Banking Days. That response can be either a return or a formal status update. A secure exchange portal is available to facilitate these requests and responses.

WSUD Deadline Extended

The Written Statement of Unauthorized Debit (WSUD) no longer needs to be signed by the settlement date. It may now be signed on or after the effective date of the debit, offering greater flexibility for account holders disputing unauthorized transactions.

Fraud Monitoring Requirements for Originators and ODFIs

Beginning in 2026, Nacha will require risk-based fraud detection processes for all Originators and ODFIs. The requirement will take effect in two phases.

Phase 1 begins in March 2026 and applies to Non-consumer Originators (and vendors) with 2023 ACH origination volume of 6 million or greater.

Phase 2 begins in June 2026 and applies to all others.

Processes must be reviewed annually. There is no requirement to review each individual transaction or to conduct manual review before file submission. Instead, participants must establish reasonable procedures to flag suspicious activity based on patterns, amounts, frequency, or account behavior.

Credit Monitoring Requirements for RDFIs

Receiving institutions must implement a risk-based credit monitoring process and respond appropriately when suspicious activity is identified.

This process should be reviewed annually to ensure it remains effective. Monitoring does not require line-by-line transaction reviews, but should include logic to detect red flags such as:

  • SEC codes that do not match account types
  • Unusually large credit amounts
  • Multiple credits from different states

What You Should Do Now

  • Update your fraud detection processes
  • Train your staff on new classifications like False Pretenses and changes to R17 and R06
  • Ensure your systems support the new entry descriptions PAYROLL and PURCHASE
  • Prepare for the phased rollout of the fraud monitoring requirements
  • Review WSUD policies to allow for signature on or after the effective date
  • Test your response time and documentation process for R06 return requests

Final Thoughts

These updates strengthen the ACH ecosystem and clarify roles and responsibilities across all parties. With deadlines extending into 2026, now is the time to make adjustments, train your staff, and ensure your ACH operations align with Nacha’s evolving standards.

At Viking, we build solutions like VIKEngage, VIKExpress, and VIKEdge with these compliance needs in mind. Whether you need real-time monitoring, simplified return processes, or tools to minimize fraud risk, we’re here to help.

If you have questions about your readiness or need support implementing these changes, reach out to your Viking representative today.

Return to Viking Resource Center

July 17, 2025

About Megan Williams

She is a dedicated payments professional with a passion for operational processes, efficiencies and a love for the Rules. She has been in the financial services industry since 2016, strengthening her understanding of the space and obtaining her ACH Certification (AAP). She specializes in optimizing operations, enhancing payment processes and ensuring compliance in all matters of her job and this industry. 

Learn More

Bigger Possibilities Await.

Contact Us


Read More

Payment Processing FAQ

9 July 2025
Adam Garrett
No comments
Categories: ACH, Lenders, Merchants, Payments

Payment Processing FAQ
What Every Merchant Should Know

Whether you’re new to payment processing or a seasoned operator, the landscape is constantly evolving. From faster ACH return options to the latest tools in transaction management, merchants need to stay current to reduce risk and operate efficiently. Below, we answer some of the most common questions we hear from clients.

1. Can Returns Be Processed Using Same-Day ACH?

Yes, and it can be a significant improvement for your operations.

Under Nacha and UMACHA guidelines, ACH returns can be processed using Same-Day ACH, even if the original transaction was not sent as a same-day item.

Here’s what you need to know:

  • No Same-Day Entry Fees for Returns – RDFIs are not charged fees for initiating returns using the Same-Day ACH window
  • Faster Return Resolution – Same-day returns reduce liquidity exposure, accelerate reconciliation, and minimize the risk of downstream errors
  • Improved Risk Management – Quicker returns help detect and respond to issues such as fraud or invalid accounts faster
  • Everyone Benefits – Faster return processing supports ODFIs, RDFIs, and Originators by reducing uncertainty and improving settlement timelines

If your return process still follows next-day timing by default, we recommend evaluating a same-day return process to improve overall performance and responsiveness.

2. Is There an Online Portal for Viewing Card Transactions and Chargebacks?

Yes. Viking offers Viking VRM (Viking Relationship Manager), a secure online portal where you can manage card activity, monitor chargebacks, and review reporting, all in one place.

Key features include:

  • Real-time visibility into card transactions and funding activity
  • Chargeback management, including retrieval request tracking and resolution statuses
  • Batch and individual transaction lookup, with exportable reports for reconciliation
  • Detailed fee reporting, including interchange and processor-level assessments
  • User-level access controls, so teams can manage workflows without overexposing sensitive data

If you don’t already have access to Viking VRM, contact your Viking representative. We’ll get your user credentials set up and walk you through how to get the most from the platform. It’s a powerful resource for day-to-day card operations and dispute management.

3. What About an Online Portal for Viewing ACH Transactions and Returns?

Viking provides clients with access to VIKEngage, a powerful transaction insight platform designed to give real-time visibility into ACH activity and return rates.

With VIKEngage, you can:

  • Track ACH debits, credits, and returns by code and date in real time
  • Monitor your return ratios to ensure you stay below NACHA’s thresholds
  • Filter, review, and export transaction data for compliance reporting or internal audits
  • Identify operational trends or problem accounts that may need attention
  • Access intuitive dashboards that simplify ongoing compliance and risk oversight

VIKEngage is available via a user-friendly web portal and requires no additional integration or setup for existing clients. If you’re not already using it, reach out to your Viking representative and we’ll get you connected.

4. What New Technology Is Viking Working On?

We’re investing heavily in the future of payments through our VIKEngine suite, a set of connected tools designed to bring speed, intelligence, and risk reduction to your operations.

Here’s a look at what’s currently available:

  • VIKExpress – Enables real-time disbursements through both the RTP and FedNow networks. Funds are delivered instantly, 24/7, improving borrower satisfaction and reducing operational delays
  • VIKEdge – Combines ACH processing with real-time bank balance verification, reducing NSF returns and giving you confidence before initiating debits
  • VIKEngage – A transaction insight platform that gives you real-time visibility into ACH activity, return codes, and performance trends to help you stay below NACHA thresholds and make informed decisions
  • VIKExclude – A pre-funding screening tool that checks routing and account numbers against a proprietary database of accounts with known fraud or return history, helping prevent losses before funds are sent

Each of these tools is available individually or as part of a broader VIKEngine integration, and all are designed to help merchants operate faster, smarter, and more securely.

5. How Often Should Merchants Review Their Policies and Procedures?

At minimum, payment processing policies and procedures should be reviewed and updated annually.

Doing so helps ensure:

  • Compliance with NACHA, PCI DSS, and card brand requirements
  • Internal controls remain aligned with evolving risk
  • Documentation accurately reflects current systems and staff responsibilities
  • You’re prepared for audits or external reviews

Reviews should also be triggered after any major operational changes, system upgrades, or security incidents. An annual review is a simple but critical part of keeping your business compliant and audit-ready.

Still Have Questions?

We’re always here to help. Whether you’re looking to streamline your return process, access Viking VRM, or explore the VIKEngine platform, your Viking representative is just a call or email away.

Let us know what you’d like to see covered in a future FAQ. We’re always listening.

Return to Viking Resource Center

July 9, 2025

About Adam Garrett

He has spent almost 20 years building successful merchant acquiring programs and is a proven sales leader who brings his expertise in team management, business development, and strategic planning to Viking Payments. He received his MBA from the University of Texas at Dallas, and his BS at Missouri State University.

Learn More

Bigger Possibilities Await.

Contact Us


Read More

Common ACH Audit Findings

22 June 2025
Tracey Gibson
No comments
Categories: ACH, Lenders, Merchants, Payments

Common ACH Audit Findings
and How to Stay Compliant

Every year, businesses that originate ACH transactions are subject to an ACH audit, as required by the NACHA Operating Rules. While many audits go smoothly, there are a handful of recurring issues that pop up year after year. Some are simple, others potentially serious. Whether you’re preparing for an upcoming audit or looking to tighten up your existing ACH practices, understanding these common findings is a smart place to start.

Below are some of the most frequent ACH audit findings, along with insights and recommendations for how to avoid them:

NACHA Guidelines, Chapter 56

Chapter 56 of the NACHA Rules covers the audit requirements that every ACH Originator and Third-Party Sender must follow. It requires an annual audit to ensure compliance with the NACHA Operating Rules and recommends documentation for each key function. Failure to perform this audit or maintain documentation can result in non-compliance findings.

Tip: Make sure your audit is performed annually by a qualified party and that you retain clear documentation of the audit scope, findings, and corrective actions taken.

Annual Review of NACHA Contact List

NACHA requires that each company maintain and annually review its contact information in NACHA’s database. This ensures that your organization can be contacted in the event of a network or transaction issue.  [When working with Viking, this information is located on Schedule E of your ACH Origination Agreement]

Tip: Set a calendar reminder to review and update your NACHA contact list every 12 months.

Annual ACH Risk Assessment Must Include Risk Ratings

The Risk Assessment is more than a formality. NACHA expects a formal risk assessment document that includes risk ratings for each threat and control in your ACH process.

Tip: Document not only risks, but also the impact, likelihood, and controls in place. Assign risk levels to each category, such as Low, Medium, or High.

Proper Use of SEC Codes

Improper use of Standard Entry Class (SEC) Codes, such as using PPD instead of WEB for internet-authorized transactions, is a frequent finding.

Tip: Confirm that every transaction is being coded appropriately. For example:
• PPD: Prearranged payment and deposit (consumer, pre-authorized)
• WEB: Consumer-initiated internet or mobile transactions
• TEL: Telephone-initiated

Origination Agreements Missing or Incomplete

Originators are required to have signed agreements with all parties involved in ACH transactions, including clear authorization language and responsibilities.

Tip: Review your agreements annually and ensure all parties are documented and acknowledged in writing.

Failure to Act on Notice of Change (NOC)

When a financial institution issues a Notice of Change, you’re required to update your records before the next transaction or within six banking days, whichever comes first.

Tip: Assign ownership of NOC monitoring and include this step in your daily ACH processing checklist.

Return Processing Inconsistencies

ACH returns must be processed quickly and accurately. A delay in responding to unauthorized debits or incorrect return coding is a compliance risk.

Missing “RETRY PYMT” Code for Reinitiated Payments

If a payment is reinitiated due to insufficient funds, NACHA rules require the word “RETRY PYMT” in the Company Entry Description field. Without it, the transaction could be flagged as unauthorized.

Tip: Automate the insertion of “RETRY PYMT” into all reinitiated NSF entries to ensure compliance.

Lack of a Business Continuity Plan

Many businesses fail to create or test a formal Business Continuity Plan for ACH operations, which is a NACHA expectation.

Tip: Draft a documented plan outlining how ACH processing will continue in the event of a disruption. Test it annually and keep logs of those tests.

Missing or Outdated Reg E Disclosures

The Electronic Funds Transfer Act (Regulation E) requires specific consumer disclosures, such as dispute rights and liability limits. These must appear on account statements or statement backers.

Tip: Review your Reg E disclosures annually and confirm that consumers receive them through appropriate channels.

Terms and Conditions Lacking ACH Language

Many merchant agreements and consumer-facing Terms and Conditions lack clear language about ACH authorization, dispute procedures, and usage of recurring entries.

Tip: Add a section to your Terms and Conditions that explains how ACH transactions are authorized and handled. Include clear consent language.

Final Thoughts

Being prepared for your next ACH audit starts with awareness. These common findings don’t just reflect compliance oversights, they point to real operational risks that could lead to fines, returns, or customer dissatisfaction.

Want help tightening up your ACH processes? Reach out to your Viking representative today.

Return to Viking Resource Center

June 22, 2025

About Tracey Gibson

She is an accomplished compliance executive with extensive experience in overseeing and managing compliance functions and initiatives of an organization. She has expertise in ensuring organizations comply with regulatory requirements and brings a strong background in ethical business practice, risk management, privacy, employee management and customer service.

Learn More

Bigger Possibilities Await.

Contact Us


Read More

Understanding ACH Reversals: When and How to Use Them

27 May 2025
Megan Williams
No comments
Categories: ACH, Lenders

Understanding ACH Reversals
When and How to Use Them

The Automated Clearing House (ACH) network facilitates millions of financial transactions daily, making it an essential component of the U.S. payment system. However, errors can occur, necessitating the use of ACH reversals. Understanding the Rules and appropriate use of ACH Reversals is crucial for Originators to ensure compliance and maintain transaction integrity.

What is an ACH Reversal?

An ACH Reversal is the process of correcting a previously processed ACH transaction by withdrawing the funds from the recipient’s account and returning them to the Originator. This process is governed by specific rules outlined by Nacha (National Automated Clearing House Association) to prevent misuse and ensure that Reversals are only used in legitimate circumstances.

When Can ACH Reversals Be Used?

ACH Reversals can only be initiated under specific conditions, as defined by the Nacha Operating Rules and Guidelines. According to Nacha, these conditions include:

  1. Duplicate Transactions: When a single transaction is processed more than once.
  2. Incorrect Amount: When the amount of the transaction is incorrect.
  3. Incorrect Account: When the transaction is credited to the wrong account.
  4. Payment Originator Error: Any error that is attributable to the originator of the transaction, such as entering incorrect transaction information.

It is important to note that ACH Reversals are time-sensitive. Nacha rules stipulate that reversals must be initiated within five banking days from the settlement date of the original transaction.

Differences Between ACH Reversals and ACH Returns

While ACH Reversals are initiated by the Originator to correct errors, ACH returns are typically initiated by the receiving financial institution (RDFI). ACH returns occur when the recipient’s bank is unable to process the transaction due to reasons such as insufficient funds, closed accounts, authorization concerns or fraud.

Process of Initiating an ACH Reversal

The process of initiating an ACH Reversal involves several steps:

  1. Identify the Error: Determine the nature of the error that necessitates a Reversal.
  2. Notify the Receiving Party: Inform the recipient of the erroneous transaction and the forthcoming Reversal.
  3. Initiate the Reversal Entry: The Originator’s financial institution (ODFI) will create a reversing file entry using the appropriate ACH information.
  4. Include “REVERSAL” in Description: It is mandatory to include the word “REVERSAL” in the Company Entry Description field of the Reversal entry.
  5. Compliance Check: Ensure that the Reversal complies with Nacha Rules, including the five-day timeframe and the specific conditions under which Reversals are allowed.

Best Practices for Managing ACH Reversals

To effectively manage ACH Reversals and minimize potential disputes or compliance issues, Originators should adopt the following best practices:

  • Accurate Data Entry: Ensure that all transaction data is accurate before initiating ACH transactions.
  • Timely Action: Act promptly to identify errors and initiate Reversals within the permissible timeframe.
  • Clear Communication: Maintain transparent communication with all parties involved in the transaction, especially when an error occurs.
  • Regular Audits: Conduct regular audits of ACH transactions to quickly identify and rectify any discrepancies.
  • Minimize Use: Only allow authorized staff to initiate.

By understanding and adhering to Nacha’s rules on ACH Reversals, Originators can efficiently correct transaction errors while maintaining compliance and minimizing the risk of disputes. For further details on the rules and best practices related to ACH Reversals.

Return to Viking Resource Center

May 27, 2025

About Megan Williams

She is a dedicated payments professional with a passion for operational processes, efficiencies and a love for the Rules. She has been in the financial services industry since 2016, strengthening her understanding of the space and obtaining her ACH Certification (AAP). She specializes in optimizing operations, enhancing payment processes and ensuring compliance in all matters of her job and this industry. 

Learn More

Bigger Possibilities Await.

Contact Us


Read More

PCI DSS Non-Compliance: Why Is It Important?

23 July 2024
Tracey Gibson
No comments
Categories: ACH, Merchants, Payments

PCI DSS Non-Compliance
Why Is It Important?

In today’s digital age, safeguarding sensitive information has never been more critical. Businesses that handle card payments must adhere to the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS). Yet, despite its importance, some organizations still fall short of compliance. Understanding why PCI DSS compliance is crucial can help businesses protect their customers, reputation, and bottom line.

What is PCI DSS?

PCI DSS is a set of security standards established by the PCI Security Standards Council, including major credit card brands like Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover, and JCB. These standards ensure that companies processing, storing, or transmitting credit card information maintain a secure environment to protect against breaches and fraud.  The standard comprises 12 main requirements, ranging from maintaining a secure network to implementing strong access control measures and regularly monitoring and testing networks.

The Benefits of PCI DSS Compliance

Complying with PCI DSS standards offers numerous advantages, protecting sensitive data, enhancing business operations, and fostering customer trust. Here’s why achieving and maintaining compliance is crucial:

  • Enhanced Security
    • PCI DSS compliance ensures a robust security infrastructure, protecting sensitive cardholder data from theft and unauthorized access. This significantly reduces the risk of breaches, bolstering overall cybersecurity and safeguarding customer information.
  • Increased Customer Confidence
    • Consumers are more likely to trust businesses that prioritize data security. Demonstrating PCI DSS compliance can enhance customer loyalty and satisfaction, which are vital for long-term success. Customers feel assured knowing their payment information is handled securely.
  • Competitive Advantage
    • Compliance with PCI DSS can set a business apart from its competitors. It shows a commitment to security and can be a key differentiator in a crowded marketplace, attracting customers who prioritize data protection.
  • Regulatory Alignment
    • Adhering to PCI DSS helps businesses stay aligned with other regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA. This ensures broader compliance, reducing the risk of fines and penalties associated with these regulations.
  • Operational Efficiency
    • Implementing PCI DSS can lead to improved internal processes and procedures, enhancing overall operational efficiency. This can result in cost savings, better resource management, and streamlined business operations.
  • Protecting Cardholder Data
    • The primary goal of PCI DSS is to safeguard cardholder data from breaches and theft. Compliance ensures that businesses implement necessary safeguards to secure sensitive information, preventing unauthorized access and fraud.
  • Reducing the Risk of Data Breaches
    • Data breaches can have devastating financial and reputational consequences. By adhering to PCI DSS standards, businesses can significantly reduce the risk of breaches, protecting both their customers and their brand from potential harm.
  • Avoiding Legal and Financial Penalties
    • Non-compliance with PCI DSS can result in hefty fines from payment card networks. In the event of a data breach, non-compliant organizations may face penalties ranging from $5,000 to $500,000 per month until compliance is achieved, creating substantial financial burdens.
  • Facilitating Business Relationships
    • Many business partners and vendors require PCI DSS compliance as a prerequisite for collaboration. Achieving compliance can open doors to new business opportunities and partnerships, demonstrating a commitment to data security that partners and clients value.

The Risks and Consequences of Non-Compliance

Non-compliance with PCI DSS standards can expose businesses to significant risks and severe consequences, impacting financial stability, reputation, legal standing, and operational continuity.

  • Data Breaches and Cyber Attacks
    • Non-compliance heightens the risk of data breaches, as cybercriminals often target weak security systems to steal sensitive information. These breaches can lead to substantial financial losses and identity theft for customers, with costs potentially running into millions for remediation, legal fees, and settlements.
  • Financial Penalties
    • Payment brands may impose heavy fines on businesses that fail to comply with PCI DSS, ranging from thousands to millions of dollars, depending on the severity and frequency of non-compliance.
  • Legal Consequences
    • In the event of a data breach, non-compliant businesses could face legal action from affected customers and regulatory bodies. This can result in lawsuits, settlements, and additional penalties, further exacerbating financial strain.
  • Loss of Customer Trust
    • Consumers are increasingly aware of data security, and a breach can severely damage a company’s reputation. Loss of customer trust can lead to decreased sales, customer attrition, and long-term brand damage, which is difficult to recover from.
  • Business Disruption
    • Non-compliance can lead to the suspension of credit card processing privileges, causing significant disruption to business operations. This can halt sales and disrupt cash flow, especially for online retailers who rely heavily on card payments. Additionally, addressing the fallout from a data breach, including investigations and remediation efforts, can divert resources and focus from core business activities.

Overall Risks and Consequences

  • Financial Losses: Beyond fines and penalties, businesses may incur costs related to forensic investigations, legal fees, and compensation to affected customers.
  • Reputational Damage: A data breach resulting from non-compliance can severely damage a company’s reputation, leading to decreased sales, customer attrition, and long-term brand damage.
  • Legal Ramifications: Non-compliant businesses may face lawsuits from customers, shareholders, and other stakeholders affected by a data breach, leading to significant financial settlements and further tarnishing the company’s image.
  • Loss of Merchant Privileges: Payment card networks may revoke the ability to process credit card transactions for non-compliant businesses, severely disrupting operations and revenue streams.
  • Operational Disruptions: Addressing the fallout from a data breach can disrupt business operations, diverting resources and focus from core activities.

Understanding and mitigating these risks by ensuring PCI DSS compliance is essential for protecting a business’s financial health, legal standing, and reputation.

Ensuring Compliance

To avoid the severe consequences of non-compliance, businesses should take proactive steps to ensure adherence to PCI DSS standards:

  1. Conduct Regular Assessments: Regularly assess your compliance status through internal audits and third-party assessments to identify and address any gaps. Periodic reviews ensure that your business stays aligned with evolving PCI DSS requirements and can quickly adapt to any changes in the regulatory landscape.
  2. Implement Strong Security Measures: Ensure robust security protocols are in place to protect cardholder data. This includes:
    • Encryption: Encrypt sensitive data both in transit and at rest to prevent unauthorized access.
    • Firewalls: Use firewalls to block unauthorized traffic and secure your network perimeter.
    • Access Controls: Implement strict access controls to ensure that only authorized personnel have access to cardholder data. Use multi-factor authentication for an added layer of security.
  3. Educate Employees: Train employees on the importance of data security and their role in maintaining compliance. Awareness and vigilance are crucial in preventing security breaches. Employees should know how to recognize phishing attempts, handle sensitive information properly, and respond to potential security incidents.
  4. Maintain Documentation: Keep thorough documentation of security policies, procedures, and compliance efforts this includes records of:
    • Security Policies: Document your data security policies and ensure they are up-to-date.
    • Procedures: Clearly outline the procedures for handling cardholder data, including how to respond to a data breach.
    • Compliance Efforts: Maintain records of all compliance-related activities, such as audit reports, security assessments, and employee training sessions.

This documentation can be vital in demonstrating compliance during assessments and audits. It also serves as a reference for internal reviews and helps maintain consistency in your security practices.

Additional Steps for Ensuring Compliance

  1. Engage Qualified Security Assessors (QSAs): Consider working with QSAs who are certified to assess PCI DSS compliance. They can provide expert guidance and ensure that your security measures meet the required standards.
  2. Monitor and Respond to Threats: Implement a continuous monitoring system to detect and respond to security threats in real-time. This includes intrusion detection systems (IDS), security information and event management (SIEM) solutions, and regular vulnerability scans.
  3. Update Technology and Software: Regularly update all technology and software to protect against known vulnerabilities. This includes patch management for operating systems, applications, and network devices.
  4. Develop an Incident Response Plan: Create and regularly update an incident response plan to quickly and effectively address any data breaches or security incidents. Ensure that all employees are familiar with the plan and their specific roles in executing it.

Conclusion

PCI DSS compliance is not just a regulatory requirement but a critical aspect of protecting your business and customers from the risks associated with data breaches. The financial, legal, and reputational consequences of non-compliance are significant, underscoring the importance of adhering to these standards. By maintaining PCI DSS compliance, businesses can ensure the security of cardholder data, enhance customer trust, and protect their bottom line.

Return to Viking Resource Center

July 23, 2024

About Tracey Gibson

She is an accomplished compliance executive with extensive experience in overseeing and managing compliance functions and initiatives of an organization. She has expertise in ensuring organizations comply with regulatory requirements and brings a strong background in ethical business practice, risk management, privacy, employee management and customer service.

Learn More

Bigger Possibilities Await.

Contact Us


Read More

Understanding Remotely Created Checks (RCCs)

9 July 2024
Tracey Gibson
No comments
Categories: ACH, Merchants, Payments

Understanding Remotely
Created Checks (RCCs)

In the dynamic world of digital payments, traditional methods like checks continue to evolve to meet modern demands. One such adaptation is the Remotely Created Check (RCC), an innovative payment method that has garnered attention for its convenience and efficiency. This article delves into what RCCs are, how they work, their uses and benefits, and the associated risks and regulatory considerations.

What is a Remotely Created Check (RCC)?

A Remotely Created Check (RCC) is a type of check that is not created by the account holder but is authorized by them for a specific transaction. These checks are generated by the Bank of First Deposit (BOFD) or Depositing Bank based on the account holder’s authorization, which is typically provided over the phone, online, or via email. Unlike traditional checks, RCCs lack a physical signature, relying instead on electronic authorization.

How RCCs Work

The process of creating an RCC involves several key steps:

  1. Authorization: The payer authorizes the transaction, providing necessary banking details such as the bank account number, routing number, the amount of the check, and consent.
  2. Creation: The Bank of First Deposit (BOFD) or Depositing Bank creates the RCC with the authorized details.
  3. Deposit and Processing: The RCC is deposited into the payee’s bank account and processed through the traditional check-clearing systems.

This streamlined process allows RCCs to be utilized in scenarios where obtaining a physical check is impractical, providing a convenient payment method.

Uses and Benefits of RCCs

RCCs are primarily used in situations where obtaining a physical check from the payer is impractical. Common scenarios include:

  • Telephone and Internet Sales: RCCs facilitate payments when the payer cannot provide a physical check but can authorize the transaction remotely.
  • Bill Payments: Utility companies and service providers may use RCCs to collect payments authorized over the phone or online.
  • Collections: RCCs can be employed by collection agencies to settle outstanding debts quickly.

The benefits of RCCs include:

  • Convenience: They eliminate the need for physical checks, speeding up the payment process.
  • Efficiency: RCCs can be processed faster than traditional checks, improving cash flow for businesses.
  • Flexibility: They allow businesses to accept payments from customers who may not have immediate access to electronic payment methods.

Risks and Regulatory Considerations

Despite their benefits, RCCs carry certain risks, particularly related to fraud and unauthorized transactions. Because RCCs do not require a physical signature, they can be susceptible to misuse if proper authorization is not obtained. The use of Remotely Created Checks (RCCs) is governed by a combination of federal regulations, state laws, and industry standards. These regulations are designed to ensure the legitimacy, security, and proper handling of RCCs to protect both consumers and businesses. Here are the key regulations and governing bodies:

1. Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)

  • UCC Articles 3 and 4: These articles address the laws of negotiable instruments and bank deposits and collections. The UCC requires that negotiable instruments, including checks, be in written form, which means RCCs must exist in paper form initially.

2. Regulation CC

  • 12 CFR Part 229: Also known as the Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks, Regulation CC governs the endorsement, collection, and return of checks. It imposes warranties and responsibilities on banks that handle RCCs to ensure their legitimacy and proper handling.

3. Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)

  • Regulation E (12 CFR Part 1005): This regulation provides protections to consumers against unauthorized electronic fund transfers. While it primarily deals with electronic payments, its consumer protection measures can extend to transactions involving RCCs.

4. Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR)

  • 16 CFR Part 310: The TSR, enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), prohibits certain payment methods deemed unfair and abusive, including remotely created payment orders (RCPOs). This rule impacts RCCs used in telemarketing by adding additional compliance requirements.

5. Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21 Act)

  • Public Law 108-100: Enacted in 2004, this federal law allows the digital processing of checks by creating a substitute check from the original paper check. It facilitates the electronic exchange of check images, which is essential for RCC processing.

6. Federal Reserve Bank Operating Circulars

  • Operating Circular 3 (OC3): This circular provides guidelines on the clearing and settlement of checks, including RCCs. The Federal Reserve Bank has also banned RCPOs that did not exist in paper form before being imaged, effective in 2019.

7. ECCHO Rules

  • Electronic Check Clearing House Organization (ECCHO): This private sector organization provides rules and standards for electronic check processing, including RCCs. ECCHO’s rules complement federal regulations and help ensure the proper handling and clearing of RCCs.

8. State Laws

  • State Variations: While the UCC provides a uniform framework, individual states may have variations in their implementation of UCC Articles 3 and 4. Businesses must comply with both federal and applicable state laws regarding RCCs.

To summarize, Remotely Created Checks are allowed by state and federal check laws, but they must be in writing, in physical form (e.g., paper) in order to be legal instruments. Remotely Created Payment Orders (RCPOs) are only legal items if they existed as paper before being imaged and processed through the check processing system.

Best Practices for Originators of RCCs

To ensure the secure and effective use of RCCs, merchants should adhere to several best practices:

  1. Product Offering and Marketing: Clearly articulate the reasons for offering RCCs and ensure they are marketed for legitimate purposes, not as a means to circumvent regulatory thresholds. Differentiate why RCCs are best for customers, such as providing more information than ACH formats and including detailed contact information on checks.
  2. Agreements: Establish distinct agreements with payment processors that outline the necessity of RCCs being paper items before imaging and processing.
  3. Policies and Procedures: Document policies addressing prohibited products and services, return rate thresholds, and the requirement for authorization verification. Policies should prohibit the use of RCCs for payments authorized over the telephone, which would violate the Telemarketing Sales Rule.
  4. Due Diligence: Implement rigorous due diligence processes for customers to ensure proper authorization and periodic review.
  5. Monitoring and Training: Regularly monitor return rates and consumer complaints, and ensure staff undergo annual training on RCC policies.
  6. Compliance and Oversight: Establish a compliance function to monitor adherence to internal policies and regulatory changes, with regular oversight reporting to ensure compliance. This reporting should occur at least quarterly and be documented in meeting minutes.
  7. Independent Review: Conduct independent reviews of the RCC program to test adherence to policies and procedures, documenting and remediating any failures.

Conclusion

Remotely Created Checks represent a notable innovation in the payments industry, providing a convenient and efficient alternative to traditional checks. However, their use necessitates meticulous attention to authorization and regulatory compliance to mitigate fraud and ensure transaction security. As businesses and consumers increasingly adopt RCCs, it is crucial to thoroughly understand their operation, benefits, and risks to leverage this payment method effectively.

Return to Viking Resource Center

July 9, 2024

About Tracey Gibson

She is an accomplished compliance executive with extensive experience in overseeing and managing compliance functions and initiatives of an organization. She has expertise in ensuring organizations comply with regulatory requirements and brings a strong background in ethical business practice, risk management, privacy, employee management and customer service

Learn More

Bigger Possibilities Await.

Contact Us


Read More

Real-Time Payments: Two New Payment Rails

1 July 2024
John O'Shea
No comments
Categories: ACH, Lenders, Merchants, Payments

Real Time Payments

Two New Payment Rails

In the rapidly evolving landscape of financial transactions, the need for speed, efficiency, and security is paramount. Two new real-time payment rails—RTP (Real-Time Payments) and FedNow—are revolutionizing the way money moves, offering unparalleled advantages to businesses and consumers alike. This article delves into the features and benefits of these innovative payment systems and introduces VIKExpress, a new application by Viking that seamlessly integrates both networks.

RTP Network

The RTP network, launched by The Clearing House in 2017, is designed to enable instant payments across the U.S. financial system. Here are some of its key features and benefits:

1. Real-Time Processing:

  • Transactions are completed in real-time, typically within seconds, 24/7/365. This constant availability ensures that payments can be made and received at any time, eliminating delays associated with traditional banking hours.

2. Enhanced Data Capabilities:

  • RTP supports rich data exchanges, allowing for more detailed payment information to accompany transactions. This feature aids in efficient reconciliation and reduces errors and disputes.

3. Immediate Funds Availability:

  • Recipients have immediate access to funds, which enhances cash flow management for businesses and provides consumers with quicker access to their money.

4. Improved Security:

  • The RTP network incorporates robust security measures, including end-to-end encryption and fraud prevention protocols, ensuring secure transaction processing.

FedNow Network

FedNow, launched by the Federal Reserve in 2023, is another significant player in the real-time payments arena. Here are its standout features and benefits:

1. Instant Settlement:

  • Similar to RTP, FedNow provides instant settlement of transactions, operating 24/7/365. This feature allows for immediate payment confirmation and access to funds.

2. Broad Accessibility:

  • FedNow aims to include a wide range of financial institutions, from large banks to smaller community banks and credit unions, promoting greater financial inclusion and access to real-time payments across diverse communities.

3. Versatile Payment Options:

  • FedNow supports various payment types, including person-to-person (P2P), business-to-business (B2B), and government-to-consumer (G2C) transactions, enhancing its versatility and applicability across different sectors.

4. Strong Fraud Prevention:

  • The network includes advanced fraud detection and mitigation tools to ensure the security and integrity of transactions, providing peace of mind to users.

VIKExpress: Bridging the Gap

To leverage the capabilities of these real-time payment networks, Viking has introduced VIKExpress, a cutting-edge application that provides users with seamless access to both RTP and FedNow networks at competitive rates. VIKExpress is designed to meet the needs of businesses and consumers by offering two primary functionalities:

1. Virtual Terminal:

  • The Virtual Terminal feature allows businesses to process payments in real-time directly from their browser, providing a convenient and user-friendly interface for managing transactions.

2. API Integration:

  • For businesses looking to integrate real-time payment capabilities into their existing systems, VIKExpress offers robust API integration. This feature enables seamless, automated payment processing, enhancing operational efficiency and customer experience.

By combining the speed and security of RTP and FedNow with the innovative features of VIKExpress, Viking is setting a new standard in real-time payment solutions. Whether through the Virtual Terminal or API integration, users can enjoy the benefits of instant payments, improved cash flow, and enhanced transaction security.

In conclusion, the advent of RTP and FedNow networks marks a significant milestone in the evolution of payment systems. These real-time payment rails offer unprecedented speed, efficiency, and security, transforming how money moves in the digital age. With VIKExpress, Viking provides a powerful tool to access these networks, enabling businesses and consumers to fully capitalize on the advantages of real-time payments.

To learn more about VIKExpress, click here.

Return to Viking Resource Center

July 1, 2024

About John O’Shea

He is a former founder and owner of Triad Financial Services and has served in similar roles at GMAC/Residential Funding, AllianceOne and ICT Group (now Sykes). He has performed for 28 years as a senior executive in the ARM, Customer Contact and BPO markets. He is a graduate of St. Olaf College.

Learn More

Bigger Possibilities Await.

Contact Us


Read More